|
|
Post by Meta Black Yoshi on Dec 31, 2006 15:48:56 GMT -5
What creature are you talking about when you say "sparky" do you mean the thing from SMB2 or the ones from SMW that are the same species as Watt? Or are you talking about the amps from SM64?, those seem the most chomp-like of the three. O yea. I'm talking about the amps. The stickers in MP4 are in the same image as them and they are called sparky stickers so I guess that confuses me. |
|
|
|
Post by Rex on Mar 1, 2007 10:30:47 GMT -5
Ehhh, I don't think that sparkeys and fire chomps are in any way related. They just have fire powers.
|
|
|
|
Post by L.D. on Mar 1, 2007 16:49:17 GMT -5
eh, I've been confused. amps, sparky's and chomps are all unrealated to each other
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoshi Master on Mar 1, 2007 17:32:13 GMT -5
Amp, electric ball probably made of metal, but the face is completely different from a chomp
Spark, ball of electric energy
Sparky, sparking ball of fire
Fire Chomp, it's head is a bomb which suggests they're synthetically made, which means it's not related to chomps
NONE OF THESE ARE RELATED TO EACH OTHER
|
|
|
|
Post by Meta Black Yoshi on Mar 1, 2007 18:07:11 GMT -5
Amp, electric ball probably made of metal, but the face is completely different from a chomp Spark, ball of electric energy Sparky, sparking ball of fire Fire Chomp, it's head is a bomb which suggests they're synthetically made, which means it's not related to chomps NONE OF THESE ARE RELATED TO EACH OTHER ;/ Amps and sparky "stickers" are obviously related to eachother. I'm not quite sure how sparkys got into this conversasion. Fire Chomps look alot like amps with fire tails and are an elemental like amps. Not sure if all that means the're related but I do know that fire chomps are cousins of chain chomps. If fire chomps are related to amps that means amps are related to chain chomps. I have no ggret proof to prove amps are related to the chomps but I kinda think they might be related in some kind of elemental circle. Firechomp the fire version, amp the electricle type, hmm if I add in stone chomps as the earth elemental that might explain some of the mysteries sourounding it, then lastly chainchomps and shark chomps wich could be a variety of things. Metal, neutral, there might even be more relatives somewhere in the univers. |
|
|
|
Post by Claws on Mar 20, 2007 11:36:44 GMT -5
Hmm. A chomp for each element. Obviously, these things are distantly related; they're all balls with some type of inherent energy about them. And since we've agreed that chain chomps are organisms instead of robots, I think fire chomps could also be considered living.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rex on Mar 20, 2007 14:51:13 GMT -5
Stone chomps are carvings of chomps broght to life by tutankoopa.
|
|
|
|
Post by Meta Black Yoshi on Mar 20, 2007 17:45:41 GMT -5
There's also chomp rocks, but I'd say that out of all of them chomp rocks are the least likey to be alive.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jellyfloater on Mar 23, 2007 16:27:15 GMT -5
I doubt chomp rocks are alive. They're just rocks shaped like chomps. same with stone chomps, except they're magically animated.
|
|
|
|
Post by Meta Black Yoshi on Mar 23, 2007 21:05:56 GMT -5
That makes sense
|
|
|
|
Post by Rex on Mar 24, 2007 7:52:14 GMT -5
No one ever said chomp rocks were alive.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoshi Master on Mar 24, 2007 11:36:39 GMT -5
There's also chomp rocks, but I'd say that out of all of them chomp rocks are the least likey to be alive. Chomp rocks are just that, rocks. The End |
|
|
|
Post by Rex on Mar 24, 2007 13:13:39 GMT -5
As for fire chomps, they are related to chain chomps. The name proves it, they just have fire balls instead of a chain. I don't think nintendo would call both of them chomps if they weren't related.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jellyfloater on Mar 24, 2007 20:33:38 GMT -5
The body of a Fire Chomp isn't as strong as a Chain Chomp's... Perhaps this aids them when they explode?
|
|
|
|
Post by Meta Black Yoshi on Mar 24, 2007 21:28:30 GMT -5
There's also chomp rocks, but I'd say that out of all of them chomp rocks are the least likey to be alive. Chomp rocks are just that, rocks. The End If they were just rocks, why would they be shaped like chain chomps? I might have beleived you if you had said they were just rocks shaped like chain chomps.......Anyway, I wonder who made them. And what were they made for? Just a tribute to chain chomps. Or maby they were just made to roll over enemies and reach higher ground. :/ |
|
|
|
Post by Rex on Mar 25, 2007 10:53:54 GMT -5
chomps have existed for thousends of years (proven by dry dry ruins) maybe some anchient civilazation worshiped chain chomps and carved their faces into rocks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jellyfloater on Mar 26, 2007 2:05:11 GMT -5
It's very plausible. Civilisations worship all kinds of things. So, what about Fire Chomps? Why did they develop weaker bodies?
|
|
|
|
Post by L.D. on Mar 26, 2007 10:14:07 GMT -5
not as big. that and seeing as they have more ways to attack, evolution saw it fit to weaken their bodies
|
|
|
|
Post by Rex on Mar 26, 2007 14:29:37 GMT -5
Chain chomps can be many sizes, and fire chomps proboly need weaker bodies in order to expload.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jellyfloater on Mar 29, 2007 7:03:32 GMT -5
So, people agree with me. Also, size difference is simple. Look at dogs. Some "miniatures" of normal dogs look exactly like the normal ones. The Chain Chomps adapt, or, if nessescary, are bred, to be smaller.
|
|
WHAT!!! You say Super Mario Bros. 3 is better than Super Mario World!!! Why I oughta...
