|
|
Post by Le Mario Bro on Dec 13, 2010 18:13:49 GMT -5
Then again, that was before the guys at Nintendo had fully established Mario and Peach as a couple.
|
|
|
|
Post by kingkoopa on Dec 13, 2010 19:23:51 GMT -5
Dinosaur you seriously need to calm down. It seems like every single topic I see you posting in, you have tried to start a flame war of some kind. If Toomai had upgraded me at this point, you would be getting a suspension from the site if you tried to start a flame war one more time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vent on Dec 13, 2010 21:04:53 GMT -5
How is trying to refute the above arguments "starting a flame war"? I didn't insult anybody without reason.
|
|
|
|
Post by Koopalmier on Dec 14, 2010 1:38:46 GMT -5
How is trying to refute the above arguments "starting a flame war"? I didn't insult anybody without reason. We're a bunch of immature idiots, so a justificated insult or a nice counter-argument may eventually start as a flame war - started by someone else though. ... I guess ? It's the element that countered the idea that the series was canon. That was way before it was established Mario loves Peach, and that's an old game anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by Vent on Dec 14, 2010 3:40:26 GMT -5
One element automatically makes four whole games "not canon" yet an extremely similar element from earlier gets brushed off because something "wasn't established yet"?
Alright. It's official. You're TRYING to be argumentative.
|
|
|
|
Post by SMBBQ on Dec 14, 2010 7:26:13 GMT -5
You know, if you think our arguments are stupid, you can always...
1. Prove why they are (calmly)
2. Leave
So, what'll it be?
|
|
|
|
Post by Koopalmier on Dec 14, 2010 10:57:41 GMT -5
One element automatically makes four whole games "not canon" One MAJOR element. It's not because the first games seem to be canon that they are ; and the fourth game confirmed they aren't by breaking an established fact of the main series. Oh, and the MvsDK DK is said to be the same one than the one who kidnapped Pauline in the original arcade game. Then it'd be Cranky Kong. But the Mini-Marios were made to cash on Mario's popularity. Then the series would happen in the current time period, where Mario saves Peach every few weeks and Cranky is an old guy. So, the MvsDK series ignores TWO major facts of the main series. In Super Mario Bros., Bowser was a cruel monster of pure evil. Then that was retconned when they decided Bowser would be a joke character. In Super Mario Land, Mario apparently loves Daisy. Then that was retconned when they decided Peach would be Mario's girlfriend. Alright. It's official. You're NOT TRYING to explain why my arguments are bad, and instead just go disagreable. |
|
|
|
Post by kingkoopa on Dec 14, 2010 18:22:18 GMT -5
Meh sorry Dinosaur, I was just a little angry that day. And you weren't exactly helping...
|
|
|
|
Post by Vent on Dec 18, 2010 19:29:42 GMT -5
You know, if you think our arguments are stupid, you can always... 1. Prove why they are (calmly) 2. Leave So, what'll it be? "Our"? This is between me and Koopalmier! One MAJOR element. It's not because the first games seem to be canon that they are ; and the fourth game confirmed they aren't by breaking an established fact of the main series. ....what? .... what? Yeah.....and...? Because mimicking what I say is any better. PS: I DID try to explain why your argument was bad. By pointing out the flaws in what you said? Must I spell out everything? |
|
|
|
Post by Koopalmier on Dec 18, 2010 19:49:38 GMT -5
You know what ? Screw that. You're right. Now let's stop arguing about this because it's not even fun anymore. I'm not saying that because I'm wrong, I'm saying that because it doesn't advance anything.
|
|
