Dogss
Not as new as the newest
Posts: 44
|
Post by Dogss on Jan 17, 2006 16:24:58 GMT -5
They are young! Time doesn't go slower, it's just that the shorter time line is spread out a few more years. It's a completely different 'verse, so why would time co-inside with our time? It's fiction. That's like saying Harry Potter's adventure took however long it took Rowling to write the book, but we all know it took seven years, not 15.
|
|
|
|
Post by L.D. on Jan 17, 2006 16:56:58 GMT -5
ZOMG YES SOME ONE AGREE'S...sorry.
yeah,it IS another universe so I guess you can't stick the time of the games to when they came out,it takes along time to make a game so that one threoy is moot
|
|
|
|
Post by ¥0shi Guru on Jan 17, 2006 17:41:31 GMT -5
Better technology better games!
|
|
|
|
Post by Toomai on Jan 17, 2006 19:10:36 GMT -5
Better technology better games! That don't enter into it. Plus, it'd ruin the site. Example: "Why did Thwomps lose their spikes in 64 games?" "Lack of polygons." |
|
|
|
Post by Claws on Jan 18, 2006 13:45:18 GMT -5
I always thought the unwritten rule was that games occurred around the time of their release dates unless otherwise noted in the game or unless placing them in such a way would screw up the rest of the timeline. (Example: Yoshi's Island.)
|
|
|
|
Post by PDoogan on Jan 18, 2006 15:18:33 GMT -5
I know for a fact that Miyamoto said there is no peticular order to any of the Mario games. So I guess it's all just opinion. Execpt if a game makes another reference to a game like *spoiler*--->Fawful being a shop keeper in M&L2
|
|
|
|
Post by kingkoopa on Aug 6, 2008 14:48:38 GMT -5
I know this board is old but the only canon explanation is a time machine
|
|
|
|
Post by Meta Black Yoshi on Sept 22, 2008 3:29:35 GMT -5
Ya that's what we've mostly been saying ever since ML:PiT came out.
|
|
|
|
Post by kingkoopa on Sept 24, 2008 18:58:43 GMT -5
That is like the only explanation
|
|
