|
|
Post by kingkoopa on Aug 4, 2008 18:04:31 GMT -5
I know the topic sounds stupid, but it is not as it seems.
I think that during the events of NSMB Bowser created a clone so that he could start working on his plan to take over the universe (Super Mario Galaxy). That clone was thrown into the lava and became Dry Bowser.
If you do not believe me than explain why Bowser and Dry Bowser are two seperate characters in MKW.
|
|
|
|
Post by shadowgoomba on Aug 4, 2008 18:07:05 GMT -5
Explain why Metal Mario, Dr. Mario, all of the babies, Donkey Kong Jr., etc. have all appeared in the same game as their alternate form.
If you accept the games as canon, the only logical explanation for them all is a time machine.
|
|
|
|
Post by PDoogan on Aug 4, 2008 18:53:10 GMT -5
Yeah, but Jr. brought Bowser's bones back to life in the last boss battle.
I think I said this in another topic, but that skeleton doesn't necessarily have to be Bowser's. Since it doesn't have any skin, eyes or color on it's shell, it's impossible to tell who it use to be.
|
|
|
|
Post by shadowgoomba on Aug 4, 2008 19:12:16 GMT -5
But after you beat Bowser in world one, he clearly is shown to be Dry Bowser...
|
|
|
|
Post by kingkoopa on Aug 4, 2008 20:44:40 GMT -5
But after you beat Bowser in world one, he clearly is shown to be Dry Bowser... Or Bowser's clone. I got you there! |
|
|
|
Post by Toomai on Aug 5, 2008 18:06:34 GMT -5
Beating Bowser in World 1 has less significance than Jr. turning the skeleton back into Bowser in World 8.
|
|
|
|
Post by shadowgoomba on Aug 5, 2008 18:16:16 GMT -5
Beating Bowser in World 1 has less significance than Jr. turning the skeleton back into Bowser in World 8. How so? In the lava, he turns into a skeleton. |
|
|
|
Post by Toomai on Aug 5, 2008 21:13:02 GMT -5
Well, any ol' Bowser look-alike/clone could have taken a dip. But Jr. undoing the damage seems to prove he was the real deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by kingkoopa on Aug 6, 2008 8:55:37 GMT -5
Well, any ol' Bowser look-alike/clone could have taken a dip. But Jr. undoing the damage seems to prove he was the real deal. I never thought about that |
|
|
|
Post by thedude3445 on Jan 18, 2009 11:44:39 GMT -5
That had to have meant that he died for some period of time until...errr....I dunno. I guess NewSMB is the last gime in the Mario "timeline". Dry Bowser's appearance in MKWii is non-canon, as is the Babies' and DKjr. in Tennis (Well.... That's debatable). Unless the regular Bowser's appearance in MKWii is non-canon.
It's so confusing. Why did Nintendo decide to kill off the villain and only partially bring him back?!
|
|
|
|
Post by shadowgoomba on Jan 18, 2009 14:09:18 GMT -5
Time machines are the answer to all of that.
|
|
|
|
Post by kingkoopa on Jan 18, 2009 22:03:03 GMT -5
Time machines are the answer to a lot (a couple) of Mario games
|
|
|
|
Post by thedude3445 on Jan 23, 2009 19:08:05 GMT -5
Time machines are almost as bad as Magic IMO
|
|
|
|
Post by kingkoopa on Jan 23, 2009 22:21:34 GMT -5
I know, when will the paradoxes end!
|
|
|
|
Post by shadowgoomba on Jan 23, 2009 23:36:52 GMT -5
Time machines are almost as bad as Magic IMO Not really. They could be possible, we just don't know how yet. Besides, PiT forces us to accept time machines as canon. |
|
|
|
Post by kingkoopa on Jan 24, 2009 16:06:08 GMT -5
Speaking of time machines what was accepted for the baby characters
|
|
|
|
Post by shadowgoomba on Jan 24, 2009 17:59:41 GMT -5
Speaking of time machines what was accepted for the baby characters You answered your own question. |
|
|
|
Post by thedude3445 on Jan 26, 2009 16:08:20 GMT -5
xD
Well Magic is forced to be canon also, and nobody likes using that.
But, Dry Bowser and the Babies coming to the future creates a huge paradox because you're removing them from the past, therefore killing off the modern versions!
|
|
|
|
Post by shadowgoomba on Jan 26, 2009 22:27:44 GMT -5
Not if they replace them.
|
|
|
|
Post by thedude3445 on Jan 27, 2009 17:32:33 GMT -5
But they don''t, as seen in M&L:PiT and the sports games.
We are talking about time paradoxes, right?
|
|
