|
Post by Meta Black Yoshi on Apr 28, 2007 18:24:24 GMT -5
Yes you will because of gravity....-__-
|
|
|
Post by shadowgoomba on Apr 28, 2007 18:27:55 GMT -5
Do you have any evidence? I find it strange that astronauts float in something much bigger than them (the spaceship) but still move towards each other.
|
|
|
Post by Meta Black Yoshi on Apr 28, 2007 18:33:25 GMT -5
Because all atoms have a gravitational field wich attracts other atoms and we are made of attoms so we have a net gravitational field wich will attract other atoms and other things made of atoms. So if two people were in a frictionless part of space right next to eachother and there were no other gravitational forces interfering they would be attacted to eachother and would move twords one another.....
|
|
|
Post by shadowgoomba on Apr 28, 2007 18:38:45 GMT -5
But there is movement in space. It is impossible to stay perfectly still because there has to be a means of propulsion to get into space. This force, no matter how slight, is enough to overcome gravitational pull.
|
|
|
Post by Meta Black Yoshi on Apr 28, 2007 18:49:05 GMT -5
Unless gravitational pull is verry strong as if from something alot bigger, say something about the size of the snifit robot boss or a planetoid.
|
|
|
Post by shadowgoomba on Apr 28, 2007 18:57:07 GMT -5
Okay, you got me there. But why is it that the moon, being much larger than the planetoid, has such limited gravity?
|
|
|
Post by Meta Black Yoshi on Apr 28, 2007 20:16:24 GMT -5
It must be lese dense, made of less dense materials. Metal=more dense than most rock. Also it's full of holes.
|
|
|
Post by shadowgoomba on Apr 28, 2007 20:40:53 GMT -5
The hole thing doesn't really matter. I heard that a bowling ball enlarged to the size of the moon would have just as many of them. Plus, most of them aren't that deep.
|
|
|
Post by Meta Black Yoshi on Apr 28, 2007 22:05:06 GMT -5
But all of the holes together make it a little less massive than something the same size with no holes.
|
|
|
Post by shadowgoomba on Apr 28, 2007 22:23:53 GMT -5
Well, I don't really have an argument against it at the moment, so I geuss I'll just have to accept it. After all, "Once you've eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth!"-Sherlock Holmes
|
|
|
Post by Toomai on Apr 29, 2007 7:19:26 GMT -5
Yes you will. It just depends on how far away you are from any other source of gravity. We never see it happening because humans have never left a planetary (or lunar) gravitational field.
|
|
|
Post by shadowgoomba on Apr 29, 2007 9:14:16 GMT -5
But Ralphael's moon is very close to ME (might even be in the atmosphere) and people stick to that. Plus, it doesn't explain how you don't stick to the moon as well as the Earth.
|
|
|
Post by Meta Black Yoshi on Apr 29, 2007 12:38:59 GMT -5
Huh? The Earth is a whole lot more massive than the moon. It's also made of more dese materials. So the Earth has a stronger gravitational pull.
|
|
|
Post by shadowgoomba on Apr 29, 2007 14:11:01 GMT -5
So you just contradicted yourself. If it does depend on mass, then there is no way Mario could stick to the planetoid, which would have far less masd than the moon.
|
|
|
Post by Meta Black Yoshi on Apr 29, 2007 14:17:05 GMT -5
Huh? ?? But didn't I just get done explaining how the planetoid would be more dense than the moon. It depends on mass and density. And.......Like I said...Metal=More dense than rock.......
|
|
|
Post by shadowgoomba on Apr 29, 2007 14:21:24 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure it depends on mass, not density. Example: a planet made out of solid metal would have to be approximately three-quaters of the size of the Earth to have the same gravity.
|
|
|
Post by Meta Black Yoshi on Apr 29, 2007 15:24:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by shadowgoomba on Apr 29, 2007 15:33:10 GMT -5
How am I confusing you? You're missing the point with the metals example. I know that Mario can stick to ME. I was trying to point out that just because something is dense, doesn't mean it has more gravity. Here's a better example: Saturn, completely made out of gases, still will have more gravity than a nickel, despite the nickel being made out of denser material.
|
|
|
Post by Meta Black Yoshi on Apr 29, 2007 17:40:19 GMT -5
That's because Saturn has like a gajillion times more mass than a nikel. I keep saying it's mass and density!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by shadowgoomba on Apr 29, 2007 18:55:54 GMT -5
Okay, so that would mean that people could not stick to Ralphael's moon either, because, despite it having a higher density than Saturn, it also is much smaller.
|
|